Guardicore vs SAM Seamless Network
Guardicore vs SAM Seamless Network, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Guardicore is on 60/100 and SAM Seamless Network on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Guardicore
- funding raised: $112M against $50.0M
- LinkedIn following: 14,681 against 10,486
SAM Seamless Network
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 70/100
- headcount growth: -14.7% against -25.5%
At a glance
| Measure | Guardicore | SAM Seamless Network |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Guardicore provides microsegmentation and breach detection software to protect data centers and cloud environments. | Cloud-native security and intelligence for unmanaged networks and IoT devices, protecting against cyber threats. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Network Security, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, IoT Security, Network Security, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Guardicore | SAM Seamless Network |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 60 | 49 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -25.5% | -14.7% |
| Total funding | $112M | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,681 | 10,486 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Guardicore | SAM Seamless Network |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Guardicore | SAM Seamless Network |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Graphql |
What users say
| Measure | Guardicore | SAM Seamless Network |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 3 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“Intel Capital leads $12 million round for SAM Seamless Network and its home IoT security system https://t.co/8mGhQfWrIP.”r/newsbotFUNDING
Guardicore vs SAM Seamless Network: common questions
Which is better, Guardicore or SAM Seamless Network?
On our 0-100 score SAM Seamless Network rates higher (62/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Guardicore and SAM Seamless Network compare on the numbers?
Guardicore leads on funding raised ($112M against $50.0M), LinkedIn following (14,681 against 10,486). SAM Seamless Network leads on agent readiness (37/100 against 25/100), domain rating (86/100 against 70/100), headcount growth (-14.7% against -25.5%).
What do real users say about Guardicore and SAM Seamless Network?
SAM Seamless Network: 3 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/newsbotFUNDING.
Read the full Guardicore review and pricing or the SAM Seamless Network review and pricing. You can also browse other Guardicore alternatives we track.