Guardant Health vs Oncohost
Guardant Health vs Oncohost, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Guardant Health is on 57/100 and Oncohost on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Guardant Health
- our overall score: 57/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 4,663 against 46
- funding raised: $900M against $43.0M
- LinkedIn following: 274,951 against 5,471
Oncohost
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Guardant Health | Oncohost |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Guardant Health is a precision oncology company that develops and commercializes liquid biopsy tests for cancer detection, recurrence monitoring, and treatment selection. | Leveraging proteomic pattern analysis to personalize cancer treatment and improve patient outcomes. |
| Category | Biotech, MedTech, HealthTech, Genomics | Healthcare, Pharmaceutical, Oncology, Cancer |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Guardant Health | Oncohost |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4,663 | 46 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +22.3% |
| Total funding | $900M | $43.0M |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 274,951 | 5,471 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Guardant Health | Oncohost |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 10/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 70/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Guardant Health | Oncohost |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
Guardant Health vs Oncohost: common questions
Which is better, Guardant Health or Oncohost?
On our 0-100 score Guardant Health rates higher (57/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Guardant Health and Oncohost compare on the numbers?
Guardant Health leads on our overall score (57/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 21/100), domain rating (71/100 against 31/100), headcount (4,663 against 46), funding raised ($900M against $43.0M), LinkedIn following (274,951 against 5,471).
Read the full Guardant Health review and pricing or the Oncohost review and pricing. You can also browse other Guardant Health alternatives we track.