Guardant Health vs OncoDecipher
Guardant Health vs OncoDecipher, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Guardant Health is on 57/100 and OncoDecipher on 43/100.
Where each one leads
Guardant Health
- our overall score: 57/100 against 43/100
- funding raised: $900M against $1.0M
OncoDecipher
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Guardant Health | OncoDecipher |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Guardant Health is a precision oncology company that develops and commercializes liquid biopsy tests for cancer detection, recurrence monitoring, and treatment selection. | OncoDecipher uses silent mutations in cancer genomes to predict cancer type and survival probability. |
| Category | Biotech, MedTech, HealthTech, Genomics | Life Sciences, Cancer, Oncology, Mutation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | Cambridge, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Guardant Health | OncoDecipher |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4,663 | Not published |
| Total funding | $900M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 274,951 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Guardant Health | OncoDecipher |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 43/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Team | 10/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 3/100 |
| Quality | 70/100 | 52/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Guardant Health | OncoDecipher |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
Guardant Health vs OncoDecipher: common questions
Which is better, Guardant Health or OncoDecipher?
On our 0-100 score Guardant Health rates higher (57/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Guardant Health and OncoDecipher compare on the numbers?
Guardant Health leads on our overall score (57/100 against 43/100), funding raised ($900M against $1.0M).
Read the full Guardant Health review and pricing or the OncoDecipher review and pricing. You can also browse other Guardant Health alternatives we track.