Guardant Health vs MacroGenics
Guardant Health vs MacroGenics, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Guardant Health is on 57/100 and MacroGenics on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Guardant Health
- our overall score: 57/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 50/100
- funding raised: $900M against $13.5M
MacroGenics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Guardant Health | MacroGenics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Guardant Health is a precision oncology company that develops and commercializes liquid biopsy tests for cancer detection, recurrence monitoring, and treatment selection. | Biopharmaceutical company developing antibody-based therapeutics for cancer and autoimmune diseases. |
| Category | Biotech, MedTech, HealthTech, Genomics | Biotech, MedTech, HealthTech, Genomics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | Rockville, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Guardant Health | MacroGenics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4,663 | Not published |
| Total funding | $900M | $13.5M |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 274,951 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Guardant Health | MacroGenics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 10/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 12/100 |
| Quality | 70/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Guardant Health | MacroGenics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Google Cloud |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Analytics 4 |
Guardant Health vs MacroGenics: common questions
Which is better, Guardant Health or MacroGenics?
On our 0-100 score Guardant Health rates higher (57/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Guardant Health and MacroGenics compare on the numbers?
Guardant Health leads on our overall score (57/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 35/100), domain rating (71/100 against 50/100), funding raised ($900M against $13.5M).
Read the full Guardant Health review and pricing or the MacroGenics review and pricing. You can also browse other Guardant Health alternatives we track.