Guard.io vs Talon
Guard.io vs Talon, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Guard.io is on 63/100 and Talon on 74/100.
Where each one leads
Guard.io
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 60/100
Talon
- our overall score: 74/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 21,840 against 152
- funding raised: $169M against $47.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Guard.io | Talon |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Browser security extension protecting users from phishing, scams, and malicious extensions. | Talon Cyber Security developed a secure enterprise browser for distributed workforces. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Personal, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security | Cybersecurity, Enterprise Software, Browser Security, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Guard.io | Talon |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 152 | 21,840 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +71.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $47.0M | $169M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,366 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Guard.io | Talon |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 74/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 89/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Guard.io | Talon |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Guard.io vs Talon: common questions
Which is better, Guard.io or Talon?
On our 0-100 score Talon rates higher (74/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Guard.io and Talon compare on the numbers?
Guard.io leads on agent readiness (58/100 against 47/100), domain rating (71/100 against 60/100). Talon leads on our overall score (74/100 against 63/100), headcount (21,840 against 152), funding raised ($169M against $47.0M).
Read the full Guard.io review and pricing or the Talon review and pricing. You can also browse other Guard.io alternatives we track.