Guard.io vs Malwarebytes
Guard.io vs Malwarebytes, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Guard.io is on 63/100 and Malwarebytes on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Guard.io
- our overall score: 63/100 against 54/100
Malwarebytes
- domain rating: 87/100 against 71/100
- headcount: 590 against 152
- funding raised: $180M against $47.0M
- LinkedIn following: 56,582 against 21,366
At a glance
| Measure | Guard.io | Malwarebytes |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Browser security extension protecting users from phishing, scams, and malicious extensions. | Malwarebytes provides cybersecurity solutions for consumers and businesses, specializing in malware prevention, detection, and remediation. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Personal, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Malware Protection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Santa Clara, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Guard.io | Malwarebytes |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 152 | 590 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +71.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $47.0M | $180M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,366 | 56,582 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Guard.io | Malwarebytes |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 87/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Guard.io | Malwarebytes |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
Guard.io vs Malwarebytes: common questions
Which is better, Guard.io or Malwarebytes?
On our 0-100 score Guard.io rates higher (63/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Guard.io and Malwarebytes compare on the numbers?
Guard.io leads on our overall score (63/100 against 54/100). Malwarebytes leads on domain rating (87/100 against 71/100), headcount (590 against 152), funding raised ($180M against $47.0M), LinkedIn following (56,582 against 21,366).
Read the full Guard.io review and pricing or the Malwarebytes review and pricing. You can also browse other Guard.io alternatives we track.