growththerapy vs XRHealth
growththerapy vs XRHealth, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: growththerapy is on 69/100 and XRHealth on 56/100.
Where each one leads
growththerapy
- our overall score: 69/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 2,975 against 121
- headcount growth: +41.7% against +17.5%
- funding raised: $328M against $26.9M
- LinkedIn following: 123,212 against 25,327
XRHealth
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 38/100
At a glance
| Measure | growththerapy | XRHealth |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A mental health platform connecting individuals with licensed therapists and psychiatric providers, offering digital tools for matching, scheduling, and practice management. | Virtual clinics using XR technology for therapeutic care, integrating clinicians and data analytics. |
| Category | Healthcare, HealthTech, Mental Health Tech, Telemedicine | Healthcare, Virtual Reality (VR), HealthTech, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | growththerapy | XRHealth |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,975 | 121 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +41.7% | +17.5% |
| Total funding | $328M | $26.9M |
| Latest round | Series D | Post-Merger Funding |
| Valuation | Not published | $15.3M |
| LinkedIn followers | 123,212 | 25,327 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | growththerapy | XRHealth |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | growththerapy | XRHealth |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Google Cloud |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
growththerapy vs XRHealth: common questions
Which is better, growththerapy or XRHealth?
On our 0-100 score growththerapy rates higher (69/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do growththerapy and XRHealth compare on the numbers?
growththerapy leads on our overall score (69/100 against 56/100), domain rating (80/100 against 63/100), headcount (2,975 against 121), headcount growth (+41.7% against +17.5%), funding raised ($328M against $26.9M), LinkedIn following (123,212 against 25,327). XRHealth leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 38/100).
Read the full growththerapy review and pricing or the XRHealth review and pricing. You can also browse other growththerapy alternatives we track.