growththerapy vs Ophthalmic Sciences
growththerapy vs Ophthalmic Sciences, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: growththerapy is on 69/100 and Ophthalmic Sciences on 33/100.
Where each one leads
growththerapy
- our overall score: 69/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 2,975 against 2
- headcount growth: +41.7% against -24.2%
- LinkedIn following: 123,212 against 254
Ophthalmic Sciences
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | growththerapy | Ophthalmic Sciences |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A mental health platform connecting individuals with licensed therapists and psychiatric providers, offering digital tools for matching, scheduling, and practice management. | AI-powered tele-diagnosis platform for unmet needs in eyecare. |
| Category | Healthcare, HealthTech, Mental Health Tech, Telemedicine | Healthcare, Glaucoma, Telehealth, Ophthalmology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2020 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | growththerapy | Ophthalmic Sciences |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,975 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +41.7% | -24.2% |
| Total funding | $328M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Pre-Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 123,212 | 254 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | growththerapy | Ophthalmic Sciences |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 33/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 21/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | growththerapy | Ophthalmic Sciences |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
growththerapy vs Ophthalmic Sciences: common questions
Which is better, growththerapy or Ophthalmic Sciences?
On our 0-100 score growththerapy rates higher (69/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do growththerapy and Ophthalmic Sciences compare on the numbers?
growththerapy leads on our overall score (69/100 against 33/100), domain rating (80/100 against 2/100), headcount (2,975 against 2), headcount growth (+41.7% against -24.2%), LinkedIn following (123,212 against 254).
Read the full growththerapy review and pricing or the Ophthalmic Sciences review and pricing. You can also browse other growththerapy alternatives we track.