Group14 Technologies vs Wildcat
Group14 Technologies vs Wildcat, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Group14 Technologies is on 69/100 and Wildcat on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Group14 Technologies
- our overall score: 69/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 50/100 against 34/100
- funding raised: $463M against $90.0M
Wildcat
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Group14 Technologies | Wildcat |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Manufacturing advanced silicon-carbon composite anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. | Developer of advanced battery materials using a proprietary high-throughput experimentation and AI-driven platform. |
| Category | Battery Technology, Materials Science, Automotive, Energy Storage | Battery Technology, Materials Science, Automotive, Energy Storage |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Woodinville, United States | San Diego, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Group14 Technologies | Wildcat |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 255 | Not published |
| Total funding | $463M | $90.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series D |
| Valuation | $3.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 26,686 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Group14 Technologies | Wildcat |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 8/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Group14 Technologies | Wildcat |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Group14 Technologies vs Wildcat: common questions
Which is better, Group14 Technologies or Wildcat?
On our 0-100 score Group14 Technologies rates higher (69/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Group14 Technologies and Wildcat compare on the numbers?
Group14 Technologies leads on our overall score (69/100 against 50/100), domain rating (50/100 against 34/100), funding raised ($463M against $90.0M).
Read the full Group14 Technologies review and pricing or the Wildcat review and pricing. You can also browse other Group14 Technologies alternatives we track.