Group14 Technologies vs NanoGraf
Group14 Technologies vs NanoGraf, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Group14 Technologies is on 69/100 and NanoGraf on 39/100.
Where each one leads
Group14 Technologies
- our overall score: 69/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 50/100 against 38/100
- funding raised: $463M against $65.0M
NanoGraf
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Group14 Technologies | NanoGraf |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Manufacturing advanced silicon-carbon composite anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. | Advanced battery materials company developing high-energy silicon-anode technology for lithium-ion batteries. |
| Category | Battery Technology, Materials Science, Automotive, Energy Storage | Energy Storage, Battery Technology, Cleantech, Advanced Materials |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Woodinville, United States | Chicago, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Group14 Technologies | NanoGraf |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 255 | Not published |
| Total funding | $463M | $65.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series B |
| Valuation | $3.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 26,686 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Group14 Technologies | NanoGraf |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 39/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 12/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Group14 Technologies | NanoGraf |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Squarespace |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Group14 Technologies vs NanoGraf: common questions
Which is better, Group14 Technologies or NanoGraf?
On our 0-100 score Group14 Technologies rates higher (69/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Group14 Technologies and NanoGraf compare on the numbers?
Group14 Technologies leads on our overall score (69/100 against 39/100), domain rating (50/100 against 38/100), funding raised ($463M against $65.0M).
Read the full Group14 Technologies review and pricing or the NanoGraf review and pricing. You can also browse other Group14 Technologies alternatives we track.