Group-IB vs WMC Global
Group-IB vs WMC Global, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Group-IB is on 23/100 and WMC Global on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Group-IB
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 45/100
WMC Global
- our overall score: 56/100 against 23/100
At a glance
| Measure | Group-IB | WMC Global |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cybersecurity company specializing in threat intelligence, digital forensics, and incident response. | Combats phishing and fraud at scale with an agentic AI platform. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Digital Forensics, Incident Response | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Fraud Detection, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2003 | 2003 |
| Headquarters | Singapore, Singapore | Fremont, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Group-IB | WMC Global |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 44 |
| Total funding | Not published | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Grant (prize money) | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 8,553 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Group-IB | WMC Global |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 23/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 56/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Group-IB | WMC Global |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Group-IB vs WMC Global: common questions
Which is better, Group-IB or WMC Global?
On our 0-100 score WMC Global rates higher (56/100 against 23/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Group-IB and WMC Global compare on the numbers?
Group-IB leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 45/100). WMC Global leads on our overall score (56/100 against 23/100).
Read the full Group-IB review and pricing or the WMC Global review and pricing. You can also browse other Group-IB alternatives we track.