Griptape vs Manus AI
Griptape vs Manus AI, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Griptape is on 50/100 and Manus AI on 75/100.
Where each one leads
Griptape
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Manus AI
- our overall score: 75/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 87/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 137 against 20
- funding raised: $150M against $12.5M
- LinkedIn following: 124,524 against 1,570
At a glance
| Measure | Griptape | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Griptape provides an AI agent framework and cloud platform for developers to build, deploy, and scale reliable AI agents and workflows using their own data. | The general AI agent that turns your thoughts into actions. |
| Category | Agentic AI | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Generative AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Singapore, Singapore |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Griptape | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 20 | 137 |
| Total funding | $12.5M | $150M |
| Valuation | Not published | $500M |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,570 | 124,524 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Griptape | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 75/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 75/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 74/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | 87/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Griptape | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Plausible |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes, 42,600 GitHub stars |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Griptape | Manus AI |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Off-Promptâ„¢ Security & Performance, Seamless Deployment & Scaling, Comprehensive Monitoring & Management, Automated Data Preparation, Retrieval as a Service, Structure Runtime | General AI Agent, Secure Execution, Investor-Ready Deck Generation, Wide Research Approach, Script to Storyboard Conversion, Automated Trend Monitoring |
Griptape vs Manus AI: common questions
Which is better, Griptape or Manus AI?
On our 0-100 score Manus AI rates higher (75/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Griptape and Manus AI compare on the numbers?
Manus AI leads on our overall score (75/100 against 50/100), domain rating (87/100 against 42/100), headcount (137 against 20), funding raised ($150M against $12.5M), LinkedIn following (124,524 against 1,570).
Read the full Griptape review and pricing or the Manus AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Griptape alternatives we track.