Griptape vs LangChain
Griptape vs LangChain, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Griptape is on 50/100 and LangChain on 76/100.
Where each one leads
Griptape
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 42/100
LangChain
- our overall score: 76/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 312 against 20
- funding raised: $260M against $12.5M
- LinkedIn following: 514,641 against 1,570
At a glance
| Measure | Griptape | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Griptape provides an AI agent framework and cloud platform for developers to build, deploy, and scale reliable AI agents and workflows using their own data. | The platform for building reliable AI agents and LLM applications. |
| Category | Agentic AI | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Large Language Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Griptape | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 20 | 312 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +260.4% |
| Total funding | $12.5M | $260M |
| Valuation | Not published | $1K |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,570 | 514,641 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Griptape | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 76/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 84/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 83/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Griptape | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Google Tag Manager, Plausible |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Griptape | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Off-Promptâ„¢ Security & Performance, Seamless Deployment & Scaling, Comprehensive Monitoring & Management, Automated Data Preparation, Retrieval as a Service, Structure Runtime | Not published |
Griptape vs LangChain: common questions
Which is better, Griptape or LangChain?
On our 0-100 score LangChain rates higher (76/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Griptape and LangChain compare on the numbers?
Griptape leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 42/100). LangChain leads on our overall score (76/100 against 50/100), domain rating (86/100 against 42/100), headcount (312 against 20), funding raised ($260M against $12.5M), LinkedIn following (514,641 against 1,570).
Read the full Griptape review and pricing or the LangChain review and pricing. You can also browse other Griptape alternatives we track.