Greenyard vs Tridge
Greenyard vs Tridge, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Greenyard is on Not scored yet and Tridge on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Greenyard
- headcount: 1,079 against 250
- headcount growth: +1.1% against -15.9%
Tridge
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 59/100
- LinkedIn following: 91,877 against 34,059
At a glance
| Measure | Greenyard | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in fresh, frozen, and prepared produce, connecting growers and consumers sustainably. | Global B2B marketplace and intelligence platform for the food, agriculture, and marine industries. |
| Category | AgTech, FoodTech, Supply Chain, Sustainability | AgTech, FoodTech, Supply Chain, LogisticsTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1983 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium | Seoul, South Korea |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Greenyard | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,079 | 250 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.1% | -15.9% |
| Total funding | Not published | $97.2M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.7B |
| LinkedIn followers | 34,059 | 91,877 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Greenyard | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | Not published | 61/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Greenyard | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Graphql |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel |
What users say
| Measure | Greenyard | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 4.0/5 from 1 vote |
Greenyard vs Tridge: common questions
Which is better, Greenyard or Tridge?
On our 0-100 score Tridge rates higher (61/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Greenyard and Tridge compare on the numbers?
Greenyard leads on headcount (1,079 against 250), headcount growth (+1.1% against -15.9%). Tridge leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 22/100), domain rating (67/100 against 59/100), LinkedIn following (91,877 against 34,059).
Read the full Greenyard review and pricing or the Tridge review and pricing. You can also browse other Greenyard alternatives we track.