Greenhouse vs Spott
Greenhouse vs Spott, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Greenhouse is on 66/100 and Spott on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Greenhouse
- our overall score: 66/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 926 against 26
- LinkedIn following: 92,757 against 6,223
Spott
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 46/100
At a glance
| Measure | Greenhouse | Spott |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hiring software platform to help companies build great teams and make better hiring decisions. | AI-powered ATS and CRM for recruiters to find, engage, and present top talent. |
| Category | HR Tech, Talent Acquisition, Recruitment Software, Applicant Tracking System | E-commerce, Fintech, HR Tech, Recruitment Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Greenhouse | Spott |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 926 | 26 |
| Total funding | Not published | $3.2M |
| LinkedIn followers | 92,757 | 6,223 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Greenhouse | Spott |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 42/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 40/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Greenhouse | Spott |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
Greenhouse vs Spott: common questions
Which is better, Greenhouse or Spott?
On our 0-100 score Greenhouse rates higher (66/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Greenhouse and Spott compare on the numbers?
Greenhouse leads on our overall score (66/100 against 55/100), domain rating (80/100 against 40/100), headcount (926 against 26), LinkedIn following (92,757 against 6,223). Spott leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 46/100).
Read the full Greenhouse review and pricing or the Spott review and pricing. You can also browse other Greenhouse alternatives we track.

