GreenEye Technology vs Taranis
GreenEye Technology vs Taranis, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GreenEye Technology is on 60/100 and Taranis on 68/100.
Where each one leads
GreenEye Technology
- headcount growth: +28.1% against +6.0%
Taranis
- our overall score: 68/100 against 60/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 204 against 52
- funding raised: $99.6M against $49.0M
- LinkedIn following: 19,038 against 6,393
At a glance
| Measure | GreenEye Technology | Taranis |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered precision spraying for sustainable and profitable crop protection. | Taranis is a precision agriculture intelligence platform using computer vision and AI to monitor fields and prevent crop yield loss. |
| Category | Agritech, Monitor, Pest Control, AgTech | Agritech, Crop Monitoring, Satellite Imagery, AgTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Westfield, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GreenEye Technology | Taranis |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 52 | 204 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +28.1% | +6.0% |
| Total funding | $49.0M | $99.6M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,393 | 19,038 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GreenEye Technology | Taranis |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 76/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 37/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GreenEye Technology | Taranis |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
GreenEye Technology vs Taranis: common questions
Which is better, GreenEye Technology or Taranis?
On our 0-100 score Taranis rates higher (68/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GreenEye Technology and Taranis compare on the numbers?
GreenEye Technology leads on headcount growth (+28.1% against +6.0%). Taranis leads on our overall score (68/100 against 60/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 21/100), headcount (204 against 52), funding raised ($99.6M against $49.0M), LinkedIn following (19,038 against 6,393).
Read the full GreenEye Technology review and pricing or the Taranis review and pricing. You can also browse other GreenEye Technology alternatives we track.