Opmed.AI vs Qventus
Opmed.AI vs Qventus, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Opmed.AI is on 58/100 and Qventus on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Opmed.AI
- headcount growth: +72.2% against +40.1%
Qventus
- our overall score: 62/100 against 58/100
- domain rating: 51/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 256 against 64
- funding raised: $208M against $15.0M
- LinkedIn following: 37,685 against 9,858
At a glance
| Measure | Opmed.AI | Qventus |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform optimizing healthcare planning and hospital operations, especially OR scheduling. | AI platform for automating hospital operations and simplifying care flows. |
| Category | Healthcare, Hospital, Optimization, Planning | HealthTech, MedTech, Enterprise Software, Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Opmed.AI | Qventus |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 64 | 256 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +72.2% | +40.1% |
| Total funding | $15.0M | $208M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $400M |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,858 | 37,685 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Opmed.AI | Qventus |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 27/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Opmed.AI | Qventus |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Opmed.AI vs Qventus: common questions
Which is better, Opmed.AI or Qventus?
On our 0-100 score Qventus rates higher (62/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Opmed.AI and Qventus compare on the numbers?
Opmed.AI leads on headcount growth (+72.2% against +40.1%). Qventus leads on our overall score (62/100 against 58/100), domain rating (51/100 against 41/100), headcount (256 against 64), funding raised ($208M against $15.0M), LinkedIn following (37,685 against 9,858).
Read the full Opmed.AI review and pricing or the Qventus review and pricing. You can also browse other Opmed.AI alternatives we track.