Gray Swan vs Runlayer
Gray Swan vs Runlayer, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gray Swan is on 63/100 and Runlayer on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Gray Swan
- our overall score: 63/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 81 against 30
- funding raised: $45.7M against $22.0M
- LinkedIn following: 7,116 against 3,155
Runlayer
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 39/100
At a glance
| Measure | Gray Swan | Runlayer |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Gray Swan provides enterprise-grade security solutions for LLMs, developed by the pioneers of AI vulnerability research, enabling confident AI deployment. | Securely connects AI to enterprise systems with threat detection and access control. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, AI Safety, AI Alignment, Large Language Model | Security, Agentic AI, AI Governance, AI Safety |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Pittsburgh, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gray Swan | Runlayer |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 81 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +203.8% |
| Total funding | $45.7M | $22.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| Valuation | $200M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,116 | 3,155 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gray Swan | Runlayer |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 72/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | C (61/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gray Swan | Runlayer |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | PostHog | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Gray Swan | Runlayer |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 5 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Gray Swan AI—where AI security meets the underground. This is the proving ground for red teamers, hackers, & AI skeptics pushing models to their limits. Jailbreak, exploit, & expose vulnerabilities in cutting-edge AI systems.”r/
Gray Swan vs Runlayer: common questions
Which is better, Gray Swan or Runlayer?
On our 0-100 score Gray Swan rates higher (63/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gray Swan and Runlayer compare on the numbers?
Gray Swan leads on our overall score (63/100 against 54/100), domain rating (64/100 against 55/100), headcount (81 against 30), funding raised ($45.7M against $22.0M), LinkedIn following (7,116 against 3,155). Runlayer leads on agent readiness (61/100 against 39/100).
What do real users say about Gray Swan and Runlayer?
Gray Swan: 5 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full Gray Swan review and pricing or the Runlayer review and pricing. You can also browse other Gray Swan alternatives we track.