Gray Swan vs Neo Security
Gray Swan vs Neo Security, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gray Swan is on 63/100 and Neo Security on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Gray Swan
- our overall score: 63/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 25/100
- LinkedIn following: 7,116 against 656
Neo Security
- domain rating: 90/100 against 64/100
- funding raised: $112M against $45.7M
At a glance
| Measure | Gray Swan | Neo Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Gray Swan provides enterprise-grade security solutions for LLMs, developed by the pioneers of AI vulnerability research, enabling confident AI deployment. | Building the secure control layer for enterprise AI agents. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, AI Safety, AI Alignment, Large Language Model | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Software, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Pittsburgh, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gray Swan | Neo Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 81 | Not published |
| Total funding | $45.7M | $112M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| Valuation | $200M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,116 | 656 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gray Swan | Neo Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 72/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gray Swan | Neo Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | PostHog | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Gray Swan | Neo Security |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 5 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Gray Swan AI—where AI security meets the underground. This is the proving ground for red teamers, hackers, & AI skeptics pushing models to their limits. Jailbreak, exploit, & expose vulnerabilities in cutting-edge AI systems.”r/
Gray Swan vs Neo Security: common questions
Which is better, Gray Swan or Neo Security?
On our 0-100 score Gray Swan rates higher (63/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gray Swan and Neo Security compare on the numbers?
Gray Swan leads on our overall score (63/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 25/100), LinkedIn following (7,116 against 656). Neo Security leads on domain rating (90/100 against 64/100), funding raised ($112M against $45.7M).
What do real users say about Gray Swan and Neo Security?
Gray Swan: 5 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full Gray Swan review and pricing or the Neo Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Gray Swan alternatives we track.