Gravitee vs Protect AI
Gravitee vs Protect AI, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gravitee is on 20/100 and Protect AI on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Gravitee
- headcount: 222 against 33
- LinkedIn following: 37,600 against 22,513
Protect AI
- our overall score: 58/100 against 20/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 76/100
At a glance
| Measure | Gravitee | Protect AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI agent management platform for securing and controlling AI agents, APIs, and events. | Cybersecurity company focused on securing AI and ML systems with innovative MLSecOps products. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Agentic AI, AI Agent | Cybersecurity, MLOps, AI Safety, AI Governance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2023 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Seattle, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gravitee | Protect AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 222 | 33 |
| Total funding | Not published | $105M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 37,600 | 22,513 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gravitee | Protect AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 20/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 49/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gravitee | Protect AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Discourse | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes, 6,500 GitHub stars |
What users say
| Measure | Gravitee | Protect AI |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“Compared aws api gateway, azure apim, kong and gravitee for ai agent security. We needed ai agent security controls on our agent traffic (per-agent identity, per-agent rate limits, audit logging of what each agent does) and I tested the maj”r/AgentsOfAI
Gravitee vs Protect AI: common questions
Which is better, Gravitee or Protect AI?
On our 0-100 score Protect AI rates higher (58/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gravitee and Protect AI compare on the numbers?
Gravitee leads on headcount (222 against 33), LinkedIn following (37,600 against 22,513). Protect AI leads on our overall score (58/100 against 20/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 30/100), domain rating (88/100 against 76/100).
What do real users say about Gravitee and Protect AI?
Gravitee: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/AgentsOfAI.
Read the full Gravitee review and pricing or the Protect AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Gravitee alternatives we track.