Gravitee vs Kong
Gravitee vs Kong, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gravitee is on 20/100 and Kong on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Gravitee
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Kong
- our overall score: 50/100 against 20/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 987 against 222
- LinkedIn following: 76,804 against 37,600
At a glance
| Measure | Gravitee | Kong |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI agent management platform for securing and controlling AI agents, APIs, and events. | API gateway and management platform for microservices and cloud-native applications. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Agentic AI, AI Agent | API Management, Service Mesh, Cloud Native, Microservices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2015 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gravitee | Kong |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 222 | 987 |
| Total funding | Not published | $511M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 37,600 | 76,804 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gravitee | Kong |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 20/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gravitee | Kong |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Discourse | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Gravitee | Kong |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“Compared aws api gateway, azure apim, kong and gravitee for ai agent security. We needed ai agent security controls on our agent traffic (per-agent identity, per-agent rate limits, audit logging of what each agent does) and I tested the maj”r/AgentsOfAI
Gravitee vs Kong: common questions
Which is better, Gravitee or Kong?
On our 0-100 score Kong rates higher (50/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gravitee and Kong compare on the numbers?
Kong leads on our overall score (50/100 against 20/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 30/100), headcount (987 against 222), LinkedIn following (76,804 against 37,600).
What do real users say about Gravitee and Kong?
Gravitee: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/AgentsOfAI.
Read the full Gravitee review and pricing or the Kong review and pricing. You can also browse other Gravitee alternatives we track.