Gravis Robotics vs Xtend
Gravis Robotics vs Xtend, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gravis Robotics is on 51/100 and Xtend on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Gravis Robotics
- funding raised: $248M against $99.0M
- LinkedIn following: 13,874 against 6,701
Xtend
- our overall score: 63/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 42/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 149 against 65
At a glance
| Measure | Gravis Robotics | Xtend |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops advanced robotics and AI for autonomous operations in complex environments. | XTEND provides human-guided autonomous machine systems for precise maneuvers and actions in any environment. |
| Category | Robotics, Humanoid Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Autonomous Systems | Robotics, Drone Technology, Autonomous Systems, Human-Machine Interface |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gravis Robotics | Xtend |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 65 | 149 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +14.9% |
| Total funding | $248M | $99.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B1 |
| Valuation | Not published | $110M |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,874 | 6,701 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gravis Robotics | Xtend |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 16/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 42/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gravis Robotics | Xtend |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Gravis Robotics vs Xtend: common questions
Which is better, Gravis Robotics or Xtend?
On our 0-100 score Xtend rates higher (63/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gravis Robotics and Xtend compare on the numbers?
Gravis Robotics leads on funding raised ($248M against $99.0M), LinkedIn following (13,874 against 6,701). Xtend leads on our overall score (63/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (40/100 against 22/100), domain rating (42/100 against 36/100), headcount (149 against 65).
Read the full Gravis Robotics review and pricing or the Xtend review and pricing. You can also browse other Gravis Robotics alternatives we track.