Gravis Robotics vs Uma
Gravis Robotics vs Uma, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gravis Robotics is on 51/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Gravis Robotics
- headcount: 65 against 29
- funding raised: $248M against $40.0M
- LinkedIn following: 13,874 against 5,831
Uma
- our overall score: 58/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | Gravis Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops advanced robotics and AI for autonomous operations in complex environments. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, Humanoid Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Autonomous Systems | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2021 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gravis Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 65 | 29 |
| Total funding | $248M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,874 | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gravis Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 16/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gravis Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Gravis Robotics vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, Gravis Robotics or Uma?
On our 0-100 score Uma rates higher (58/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gravis Robotics and Uma compare on the numbers?
Gravis Robotics leads on headcount (65 against 29), funding raised ($248M against $40.0M), LinkedIn following (13,874 against 5,831). Uma leads on our overall score (58/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 22/100).
Read the full Gravis Robotics review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other Gravis Robotics alternatives we track.