Graphcore vs TYLsemi
Graphcore vs TYLsemi, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Graphcore is on 56/100 and TYLsemi on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Graphcore
- our overall score: 56/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 7/100
- headcount: 650 against 16
- funding raised: $854M against $43.0M
- LinkedIn following: 45,591 against 3,645
TYLsemi
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 43/100
At a glance
| Measure | Graphcore | TYLsemi |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Designs AI-specific processors (IPUs) for machine learning and AI workloads. | TYLsemi is a chiplet-first silicon company focused on AI infrastructure, delivering production-ready chiplets for connectivity, power, and efficiency to accelerate custom AI accelerator design. |
| Category | AI Chip, AI Hardware, Semiconductors, Neural Network Accelerator | AI Chip, AI Hardware, Semiconductor, Chip Design |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | Bristol, United Kingdom | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Graphcore | TYLsemi |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 650 | 16 |
| Total funding | $854M | $43.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | early-stage |
| Valuation | $2.8B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 45,591 | 3,645 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Graphcore | TYLsemi |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 47/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 7/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Graphcore | TYLsemi |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Hotjar +1 more | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Graphcore vs TYLsemi: common questions
Which is better, Graphcore or TYLsemi?
On our 0-100 score Graphcore rates higher (56/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Graphcore and TYLsemi compare on the numbers?
Graphcore leads on our overall score (56/100 against 51/100), domain rating (66/100 against 7/100), headcount (650 against 16), funding raised ($854M against $43.0M), LinkedIn following (45,591 against 3,645). TYLsemi leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 43/100).
Read the full Graphcore review and pricing or the TYLsemi review and pricing. You can also browse other Graphcore alternatives we track.