Graphcore vs NeuroBlade
Graphcore vs NeuroBlade, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Graphcore is on 56/100 and NeuroBlade on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Graphcore
- domain rating: 66/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 650 against 34
- funding raised: $854M against $111M
- LinkedIn following: 45,591 against 4,593
NeuroBlade
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
At a glance
| Measure | Graphcore | NeuroBlade |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Designs AI-specific processors (IPUs) for machine learning and AI workloads. | Semiconductor hardware company accelerating data analytics query processing speed and scale. |
| Category | AI Chip, AI Hardware, Semiconductors, Neural Network Accelerator | Semiconductor, Hardware, Data Analytics, Data Center |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Bristol, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Graphcore | NeuroBlade |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 650 | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -28.9% |
| Total funding | $854M | $111M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | $2.8B | $100M |
| LinkedIn followers | 45,591 | 4,593 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Graphcore | NeuroBlade |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Graphcore | NeuroBlade |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Graphcore vs NeuroBlade: common questions
Which is better, Graphcore or NeuroBlade?
On our 0-100 score NeuroBlade rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Graphcore and NeuroBlade compare on the numbers?
Graphcore leads on domain rating (66/100 against 52/100), headcount (650 against 34), funding raised ($854M against $111M), LinkedIn following (45,591 against 4,593). NeuroBlade leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100).
Read the full Graphcore review and pricing or the NeuroBlade review and pricing. You can also browse other Graphcore alternatives we track.