Graphcore vs Habana Labs
Graphcore vs Habana Labs, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Graphcore is on 56/100 and Habana Labs on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Graphcore
- headcount: 650 against 212
- funding raised: $854M against $105M
- LinkedIn following: 45,591 against 11,760
Habana Labs
- our overall score: 66/100 against 56/100
At a glance
| Measure | Graphcore | Habana Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Designs AI-specific processors (IPUs) for machine learning and AI workloads. | Develops AI and Deep Learning processors for data centers and cloud environments. |
| Category | AI Chip, AI Hardware, Semiconductors, Neural Network Accelerator | Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Data Center, Training |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Bristol, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Graphcore | Habana Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 650 | 212 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +76.7% |
| Total funding | $854M | $105M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | $2.8B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 45,591 | 11,760 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Graphcore | Habana Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Graphcore | Habana Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Hotjar +1 more | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Graphcore vs Habana Labs: common questions
Which is better, Graphcore or Habana Labs?
On our 0-100 score Habana Labs rates higher (66/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Graphcore and Habana Labs compare on the numbers?
Graphcore leads on headcount (650 against 212), funding raised ($854M against $105M), LinkedIn following (45,591 against 11,760). Habana Labs leads on our overall score (66/100 against 56/100).
Read the full Graphcore review and pricing or the Habana Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other Graphcore alternatives we track.