Grafana Labs vs Groundcover
Grafana Labs vs Groundcover, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Grafana Labs is on 80/100 and Groundcover on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Grafana Labs
- our overall score: 80/100 against 64/100
- domain rating: 89/100 against 68/100
- headcount: 1,844 against 129
- LinkedIn following: 285,164 against 9,827
Groundcover
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Grafana Labs | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Commercializes the open-source Grafana observability platform with AI features. | Kubernetes application monitoring using eBPF for deep visibility and performance insights, offering a cloud-native observability platform. |
| Category | Observability, Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Observability Platform | Observability, Cloud Infrastructure, Application Performance Monitoring, Infrastructure Monitoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Grafana Labs | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,844 | 129 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +65.9% |
| Total funding | Not published | $155M |
| Latest round | Unknown | Series C |
| Valuation | $9.0B | $500M |
| LinkedIn followers | 285,164 | 9,827 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Grafana Labs | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 80/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 6/100 | 51/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 89/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Grafana Labs | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Grafana Labs | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“We’re part of the founding engineering team at groundcover, building a modern, cloud-native observability platform that’s redefining how teams monitor and troubleshoot applications in Kubernetes environments. Our engineering efforts focus o”r/devops
Grafana Labs vs Groundcover: common questions
Which is better, Grafana Labs or Groundcover?
On our 0-100 score Grafana Labs rates higher (80/100 against 64/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Grafana Labs and Groundcover compare on the numbers?
Grafana Labs leads on our overall score (80/100 against 64/100), domain rating (89/100 against 68/100), headcount (1,844 against 129), LinkedIn following (285,164 against 9,827).
What do real users say about Grafana Labs and Groundcover?
Groundcover: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/devops.
Read the full Grafana Labs review and pricing or the Groundcover review and pricing. You can also browse other Grafana Labs alternatives we track.