Grafana Labs vs OpenObserve
Grafana Labs vs OpenObserve, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Grafana Labs is on 80/100 and OpenObserve on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Grafana Labs
- our overall score: 80/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 89/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 1,844 against 30
- LinkedIn following: 285,164 against 4,871
OpenObserve
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Grafana Labs | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Commercializes the open-source Grafana observability platform with AI features. | Modern observability platform delivering 140x lower storage costs with zero database management. |
| Category | Observability, Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Observability Platform | Cloud Computing, Observability, Data Analytics, Log Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Grafana Labs | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,844 | 30 |
| Total funding | Not published | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Unknown | Series A |
| Valuation | $9.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 285,164 | 4,871 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Grafana Labs | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 80/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 6/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 89/100 | 62/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Grafana Labs | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Astro, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Grafana Labs vs OpenObserve: common questions
Which is better, Grafana Labs or OpenObserve?
On our 0-100 score Grafana Labs rates higher (80/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Grafana Labs and OpenObserve compare on the numbers?
Grafana Labs leads on our overall score (80/100 against 47/100), domain rating (89/100 against 62/100), headcount (1,844 against 30), LinkedIn following (285,164 against 4,871).
Read the full Grafana Labs review and pricing or the OpenObserve review and pricing. You can also browse other Grafana Labs alternatives we track.