Grafana Labs vs Metabase
Grafana Labs vs Metabase, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Grafana Labs is on 80/100 and Metabase on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Grafana Labs
- our overall score: 80/100 against 60/100
- domain rating: 89/100 against 78/100
- headcount: 1,844 against 125
- LinkedIn following: 285,164 against 27,996
Metabase
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 49/100
At a glance
| Measure | Grafana Labs | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Commercializes the open-source Grafana observability platform with AI features. | Open-source business intelligence and embedded analytics platform. |
| Category | Observability, Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Observability Platform | Data Analytics, Business Intelligence, Analytics Platforms, Data Visualization Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Grafana Labs | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,844 | 125 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +8.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $8.0M |
| Latest round | Unknown | Series A |
| Valuation | $9.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 285,164 | 27,996 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Grafana Labs | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 80/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 6/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 89/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Grafana Labs | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Bootstrap |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Grafana Labs vs Metabase: common questions
Which is better, Grafana Labs or Metabase?
On our 0-100 score Grafana Labs rates higher (80/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Grafana Labs and Metabase compare on the numbers?
Grafana Labs leads on our overall score (80/100 against 60/100), domain rating (89/100 against 78/100), headcount (1,844 against 125), LinkedIn following (285,164 against 27,996). Metabase leads on agent readiness (58/100 against 49/100).
Read the full Grafana Labs review and pricing or the Metabase review and pricing. You can also browse other Grafana Labs alternatives we track.