Gradientcode vs Sedgwick
Gradientcode vs Sedgwick, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gradientcode is on 12/100 and Sedgwick on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Gradientcode
- LinkedIn following: 2,572 against 637
Sedgwick
- our overall score: 69/100 against 12/100
At a glance
| Measure | Gradientcode | Sedgwick |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-enabled decision intelligence solutions provider for the insurance industry. | Global provider of claims management, loss adjusting, and technology-enabled business solutions. |
| Category | AI-enabled Decision Intelligence, Insurance Tech, InsurTech, AI | Claims Management, Loss Adjusting, Risk Management, Benefits Administration |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | Not published | 1969 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Memphis, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gradientcode | Sedgwick |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 22,509 |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.0B |
| Latest round | Not published | Private Equity |
| Valuation | Not published | $13B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,572 | 637 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gradientcode | Sedgwick |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 12/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 89/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gradientcode | Sedgwick |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Fathom |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Gradientcode vs Sedgwick: common questions
Which is better, Gradientcode or Sedgwick?
On our 0-100 score Sedgwick rates higher (69/100 against 12/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gradientcode and Sedgwick compare on the numbers?
Gradientcode leads on LinkedIn following (2,572 against 637). Sedgwick leads on our overall score (69/100 against 12/100).
Read the full Gradientcode review and pricing or the Sedgwick review and pricing. You can also browse other Gradientcode alternatives we track.