Gradiant vs Veolia
Gradiant vs Veolia, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gradiant is on 61/100 and Veolia on 20/100.
Where each one leads
Gradiant
- our overall score: 61/100 against 20/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 38/100
Veolia
- domain rating: 78/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 49,124 against 859
- LinkedIn following: 836,477 against 82,956
At a glance
| Measure | Gradiant | Veolia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | End-to-end water and wastewater treatment solutions for critical industries. | Global leader in optimized resource management for water, waste, and energy. |
| Category | Water Treatment, Wastewater Treatment, Industrial Water, Resource Recovery | Water Treatment, Waste Management, Energy Services, Environmental Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | platform | Services |
| Founded | 2013 | 1853 |
| Headquarters | Newton, United States | Aubervilliers, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gradiant | Veolia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 859 | 49,124 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +16.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $804M | Not published |
| Latest round | E | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 82,956 | 836,477 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gradiant | Veolia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 20/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 88/100 | 23/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gradiant | Veolia |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Gradiant vs Veolia: common questions
Which is better, Gradiant or Veolia?
On our 0-100 score Gradiant rates higher (61/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gradiant and Veolia compare on the numbers?
Gradiant leads on our overall score (61/100 against 20/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 38/100). Veolia leads on domain rating (78/100 against 55/100), headcount (49,124 against 859), LinkedIn following (836,477 against 82,956).
Read the full Gradiant review and pricing or the Veolia review and pricing. You can also browse other Gradiant alternatives we track.