Gradiant vs Mitti Labs
Gradiant vs Mitti Labs, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gradiant is on 61/100 and Mitti Labs on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Gradiant
- headcount: 859 against 97
- funding raised: $804M against $9.5M
- LinkedIn following: 82,956 against 15,345
Mitti Labs
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 47/100
At a glance
| Measure | Gradiant | Mitti Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | End-to-end water and wastewater treatment solutions for critical industries. | Climate-tech startup making Asia's rice farming more water-resilient by combining satellite imagery, AI, and field operations to reduce water usage and methane emissions. |
| Category | Water Treatment, Wastewater Treatment, Industrial Water, Resource Recovery | Climate Tech, Agriculture Technology, Data Analytics, Carbon Credits |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Newton, United States | Bengaluru, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gradiant | Mitti Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 859 | 97 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +16.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $804M | $9.5M |
| Latest round | E | Series A |
| Valuation | $2.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 82,956 | 15,345 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gradiant | Mitti Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 55/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 88/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gradiant | Mitti Labs |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Gradiant vs Mitti Labs: common questions
Which is better, Gradiant or Mitti Labs?
On our 0-100 score Gradiant rates higher (61/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gradiant and Mitti Labs compare on the numbers?
Gradiant leads on headcount (859 against 97), funding raised ($804M against $9.5M), LinkedIn following (82,956 against 15,345). Mitti Labs leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 47/100).
Read the full Gradiant review and pricing or the Mitti Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other Gradiant alternatives we track.