Gradiant vs Kumulus Water
Gradiant vs Kumulus Water, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gradiant is on 61/100 and Kumulus Water on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Gradiant
- our overall score: 61/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 859 against 33
- funding raised: $804M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 82,956 against 19,499
Kumulus Water
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Gradiant | Kumulus Water |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | End-to-end water and wastewater treatment solutions for critical industries. | Kumulus Water is tackling water scarcity with atmospheric water generation technology. |
| Category | Water Treatment, Wastewater Treatment, Industrial Water, Resource Recovery | Water Treatment, Climate Tech, Energy & Climate Tech, Sustainability |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Newton, United States | Tunis, Tunisia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gradiant | Kumulus Water |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 859 | 33 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +16.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $804M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | E | Seed |
| Valuation | $2.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 82,956 | 19,499 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gradiant | Kumulus Water |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 45/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 88/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gradiant | Kumulus Water |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Gradiant vs Kumulus Water: common questions
Which is better, Gradiant or Kumulus Water?
On our 0-100 score Gradiant rates higher (61/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gradiant and Kumulus Water compare on the numbers?
Gradiant leads on our overall score (61/100 against 46/100), domain rating (55/100 against 36/100), headcount (859 against 33), funding raised ($804M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (82,956 against 19,499).
Read the full Gradiant review and pricing or the Kumulus Water review and pricing. You can also browse other Gradiant alternatives we track.