Gradiant vs Kando
Gradiant vs Kando, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gradiant is on 61/100 and Kando on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Gradiant
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 859 against 50
- headcount growth: +16.2% against -15.1%
- funding raised: $804M against $36.0M
- LinkedIn following: 82,956 against 6,902
Kando
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Gradiant | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | End-to-end water and wastewater treatment solutions for critical industries. | Data intelligence platform leveraging real-time wastewater quality data for public health and environmental improvement. |
| Category | Water Treatment, Wastewater Treatment, Industrial Water, Resource Recovery | Industrial, Water, IoT, Sensor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | platform | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2013 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Newton, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gradiant | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 859 | 50 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +16.2% | -15.1% |
| Total funding | $804M | $36.0M |
| Latest round | E | Series C |
| Valuation | $2.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 82,956 | 6,902 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gradiant | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 55/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 88/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gradiant | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Gradiant vs Kando: common questions
Which is better, Gradiant or Kando?
On our 0-100 score Kando rates higher (62/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gradiant and Kando compare on the numbers?
Gradiant leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 21/100), domain rating (55/100 against 31/100), headcount (859 against 50), headcount growth (+16.2% against -15.1%), funding raised ($804M against $36.0M), LinkedIn following (82,956 against 6,902).
Read the full Gradiant review and pricing or the Kando review and pricing. You can also browse other Gradiant alternatives we track.