Gradiant vs H2O Innovation
Gradiant vs H2O Innovation, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gradiant is on 61/100 and H2O Innovation on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Gradiant
- our overall score: 61/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 859 against 554
- funding raised: $804M against $395M
- LinkedIn following: 82,956 against 34,760
H2O Innovation
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Gradiant | H2O Innovation |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | End-to-end water and wastewater treatment solutions for critical industries. | H2O Innovation provides water treatment solutions. |
| Category | Water Treatment, Wastewater Treatment, Industrial Water, Resource Recovery | Not published |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | platform | Services |
| Founded | 2013 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Newton, United States | Mexico, Mexico |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gradiant | H2O Innovation |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 859 | 554 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +16.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $804M | $395M |
| Latest round | E | Public to Private |
| Valuation | $2.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 82,956 | 34,760 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gradiant | H2O Innovation |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 88/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gradiant | H2O Innovation |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Gradiant vs H2O Innovation: common questions
Which is better, Gradiant or H2O Innovation?
On our 0-100 score Gradiant rates higher (61/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gradiant and H2O Innovation compare on the numbers?
Gradiant leads on our overall score (61/100 against 44/100), headcount (859 against 554), funding raised ($804M against $395M), LinkedIn following (82,956 against 34,760).
Read the full Gradiant review and pricing or the H2O Innovation review and pricing. You can also browse other Gradiant alternatives we track.