Graas vs Textyess
Graas vs Textyess, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Graas is on 61/100 and Textyess on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Graas
- our overall score: 61/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 271 against 23
- funding raised: $49.0M against $1.5M
- LinkedIn following: 11,372 against 8,843
Textyess
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 40/100
At a glance
| Measure | Graas | Textyess |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI platform for automating business processes and customer interactions. | AI-powered WhatsApp platform for e-commerce brands to automate sales and customer engagement. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Conversational Commerce, E-commerce | Conversational Commerce, E-commerce, AI, Customer Service Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Milan, Italy |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Graas | Textyess |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 271 | 23 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -6.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $49.0M | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Pre-Series B | Pre-Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 11,372 | 8,843 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Graas | Textyess |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 28/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Graas | Textyess |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Framer |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, PostHog, Facebook Pixel |
Graas vs Textyess: common questions
Which is better, Graas or Textyess?
On our 0-100 score Graas rates higher (61/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Graas and Textyess compare on the numbers?
Graas leads on our overall score (61/100 against 46/100), domain rating (64/100 against 28/100), headcount (271 against 23), funding raised ($49.0M against $1.5M), LinkedIn following (11,372 against 8,843). Textyess leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 40/100).
Read the full Graas review and pricing or the Textyess review and pricing. You can also browse other Graas alternatives we track.