GPT Codex vs Magic
GPT Codex vs Magic, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GPT Codex is on 21/100 and Magic on 65/100.
Where each one leads
GPT Codex
- domain rating: 97/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 6,582 against 37
Magic
- our overall score: 65/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | GPT Codex | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered code generation and understanding platform, formerly GPT Codex. | AI-powered coding agents for automated software engineering tasks. |
| Category | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GPT Codex | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6,582 | 37 |
| Open roles | Not published | 10 |
| Total funding | Not published | $10.0M |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,371,681 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GPT Codex | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 21/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 97/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GPT Codex | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
What users say
| Measure | GPT Codex | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“I’ve spent 3 months building a 4X space strategy game almost entirely through ChatGPT/Codex agents. I’ve been working nonstop for about three months on a space strategy game called Galactum Meridian , and almost everything has been prompt-d”r/codex
GPT Codex vs Magic: common questions
Which is better, GPT Codex or Magic?
On our 0-100 score Magic rates higher (65/100 against 21/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GPT Codex and Magic compare on the numbers?
GPT Codex leads on domain rating (97/100 against 56/100), headcount (6,582 against 37). Magic leads on our overall score (65/100 against 21/100).
What do real users say about GPT Codex and Magic?
GPT Codex: 1 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/codex.
Read the full GPT Codex review and pricing or the Magic review and pricing. You can also browse other GPT Codex alternatives we track.