GoodRx vs mPulse
GoodRx vs mPulse, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GoodRx is on 58/100 and mPulse on 56/100.
Where each one leads
GoodRx
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 85/100 against 60/100
- funding raised: $200M against $31.0M
mPulse
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | GoodRx | mPulse |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A long-standing leader in prescription savings, now expanding into a membership model for comprehensive routine care. | Personalized mobile engagement platform for healthcare providers. |
| Category | HealthTech, Digital Health, Prescription Savings, Telemedicine | HealthTech, MedTech, Patient Engagement, Digital Health |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Santa Monica, USA | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GoodRx | mPulse |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 632 |
| Total funding | $200M | $31.0M |
| Latest round | Secondary Market | Series B |
| Valuation | $2.8B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 10,992 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GoodRx | mPulse |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 85/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GoodRx | mPulse |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
GoodRx vs mPulse: common questions
Which is better, GoodRx or mPulse?
On our 0-100 score GoodRx rates higher (58/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GoodRx and mPulse compare on the numbers?
GoodRx leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 21/100), domain rating (85/100 against 60/100), funding raised ($200M against $31.0M).
Read the full GoodRx review and pricing or the mPulse review and pricing. You can also browse other GoodRx alternatives we track.