Goldcast vs MoEngage
Goldcast vs MoEngage, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Goldcast is on 63/100 and MoEngage on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Goldcast
- our overall score: 63/100 against 56/100
MoEngage
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 900 against 191
- funding raised: $246M against $38.0M
- LinkedIn following: 105,739 against 29,300
At a glance
| Measure | Goldcast | MoEngage |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-first video content platform for B2B marketers to host webinars, virtual events, and repurpose video. | Customer engagement platform for brands to personalize user journeys and drive growth. |
| Category | MarTech, AdTech, B2B SaaS, Video Platform | MarTech, AdTech, Customer Engagement Platform, Personalization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Toronto, Canada | Bangalore, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Goldcast | MoEngage |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 191 | 900 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -25.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $38.0M | $246M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series F |
| LinkedIn followers | 29,300 | 105,739 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Goldcast | MoEngage |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 40/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Goldcast | MoEngage |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Sveltekit, Svelte, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Goldcast vs MoEngage: common questions
Which is better, Goldcast or MoEngage?
On our 0-100 score Goldcast rates higher (63/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Goldcast and MoEngage compare on the numbers?
Goldcast leads on our overall score (63/100 against 56/100). MoEngage leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 37/100), headcount (900 against 191), funding raised ($246M against $38.0M), LinkedIn following (105,739 against 29,300).
Read the full Goldcast review and pricing or the MoEngage review and pricing. You can also browse other Goldcast alternatives we track.