GOARC vs ShipIn Systems
GOARC vs ShipIn Systems, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GOARC is on 55/100 and ShipIn Systems on 65/100.
Where each one leads
GOARC
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
ShipIn Systems
- our overall score: 65/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 87 against 28
- headcount growth: +34.9% against -17.9%
- funding raised: $27.0M against $8.4M
- LinkedIn following: 6,501 against 3,898
At a glance
| Measure | GOARC | ShipIn Systems |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time safety intelligence platform for industrial sectors to prevent accidents and reduce risks. | AI-powered fleet vision platform for proactive maritime anomaly detection and ship-to-shore collaboration. |
| Category | Safety, Industrial, Security, Employee Risk | Maritime Technology, Fleet Management, Computer Vision, Visual Analytics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Newton, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GOARC | ShipIn Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 28 | 87 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -17.9% | +34.9% |
| Total funding | $8.4M | $27.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,898 | 6,501 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GOARC | ShipIn Systems |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 30/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GOARC | ShipIn Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Lovable | Webflow |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
GOARC vs ShipIn Systems: common questions
Which is better, GOARC or ShipIn Systems?
On our 0-100 score ShipIn Systems rates higher (65/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GOARC and ShipIn Systems compare on the numbers?
ShipIn Systems leads on our overall score (65/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 32/100), headcount (87 against 28), headcount growth (+34.9% against -17.9%), funding raised ($27.0M against $8.4M), LinkedIn following (6,501 against 3,898).
Read the full GOARC review and pricing or the ShipIn Systems review and pricing. You can also browse other GOARC alternatives we track.