GOARC vs Parter
GOARC vs Parter, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GOARC is on 55/100 and Parter on 55/100.
Where each one leads
GOARC
- domain rating: 30/100 against 17/100
- headcount: 28 against 16
- funding raised: $8.4M against $5.5M
- LinkedIn following: 3,898 against 974
Parter
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 32/100
At a glance
| Measure | GOARC | Parter |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time safety intelligence platform for industrial sectors to prevent accidents and reduce risks. | Parter is an AI platform for hardware teams that provides clarity by reading datasheets, tracking PCNs, monitoring part lifecycles, and flagging risks. |
| Category | Safety, Industrial, Security, Employee Risk | AI Platform, Hardware Development, Manufacturing, Supply Chain Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GOARC | Parter |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 28 | 16 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -17.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $8.4M | $5.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,898 | 974 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GOARC | Parter |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 30/100 | 17/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GOARC | Parter |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Lovable | Framer |
Product and pricing
| Measure | GOARC | Parter |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Proactive Insights, AI Alternative Agent, Parter Compliance Check, AI Chat with Datasheets, Observability & Monitoring |
GOARC vs Parter: common questions
Which is better, GOARC or Parter?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 19 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do GOARC and Parter compare on the numbers?
GOARC leads on domain rating (30/100 against 17/100), headcount (28 against 16), funding raised ($8.4M against $5.5M), LinkedIn following (3,898 against 974). Parter leads on agent readiness (56/100 against 32/100).
Read the full GOARC review and pricing or the Parter review and pricing. You can also browse other GOARC alternatives we track.