Gmail vs Superhuman
Gmail vs Superhuman, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gmail is on 11/100 and Superhuman on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Gmail
- domain rating: 99/100 against 79/100
Superhuman
- our overall score: 71/100 against 11/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 34/100
At a glance
| Measure | Gmail | Superhuman |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Email service provider. | An AI-native email app designed to save users time and increase productivity through faster collaboration and an efficient inbox experience. |
| Category | Email Service Provider, Webmail, Consumer App, Productivity Tools | Productivity, Email Client, AI, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gmail | Superhuman |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 189 |
| Total funding | Not published | $75.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $825M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 53,487 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gmail | Superhuman |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 11/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 59/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 68/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 99/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gmail | Superhuman |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Gmail | Superhuman |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Superhuman AI, Split Inbox, Follow-up Reminders, Snippets, Read Statuses, Autocorrect |
What users say
| Measure | Gmail | Superhuman |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 3 negative across 5 threads |
“Remember that “invite-only” email app people waited months to try and then paid $30 a month for just to blast through Gmail a bit faster? Superhuman. Grammarly announced it’s buying them.”r/startups
Gmail vs Superhuman: common questions
Which is better, Gmail or Superhuman?
On our 0-100 score Superhuman rates higher (71/100 against 11/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gmail and Superhuman compare on the numbers?
Gmail leads on domain rating (99/100 against 79/100). Superhuman leads on our overall score (71/100 against 11/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 34/100).
What do real users say about Gmail and Superhuman?
Superhuman: 0 positive and 3 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/startups.
Read the full Gmail review and pricing or the Superhuman review and pricing. You can also browse other Gmail alternatives we track.