Global Payments vs Pay.com
Global Payments vs Pay.com, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Global Payments is on 66/100 and Pay.com on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Global Payments
- our overall score: 66/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 25,016 against 85
- funding raised: $607M against $128M
- LinkedIn following: 496,036 against 5,947
Pay.com
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 37/100
At a glance
| Measure | Global Payments | Pay.com |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global fintech company providing payment technology and software solutions to merchants, issuers, and consumers. | All-inclusive payment platform for businesses of all sizes, from micro-merchants to large enterprises. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1967 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Atlanta, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Global Payments | Pay.com |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 25,016 | 85 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +14.4% |
| Total funding | $607M | $128M |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Credit Facility |
| LinkedIn followers | 496,036 | 5,947 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Global Payments | Pay.com |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 80/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Global Payments | Pay.com |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
Global Payments vs Pay.com: common questions
Which is better, Global Payments or Pay.com?
On our 0-100 score Global Payments rates higher (66/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Global Payments and Pay.com compare on the numbers?
Global Payments leads on our overall score (66/100 against 55/100), domain rating (80/100 against 61/100), headcount (25,016 against 85), funding raised ($607M against $128M), LinkedIn following (496,036 against 5,947). Pay.com leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 37/100).
Read the full Global Payments review and pricing or the Pay.com review and pricing. You can also browse other Global Payments alternatives we track.