Gloat vs Retrain.ai
Gloat vs Retrain.ai, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gloat is on 62/100 and Retrain.ai on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Gloat
- our overall score: 62/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 132 against 14
- headcount growth: -13.4% against -37.8%
- funding raised: $182M against $34.0M
- LinkedIn following: 77,174 against 5,850
Retrain.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Gloat | Retrain.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Gloat's Agile Workforce Operating System uses AI to help enterprises manage talent, skills, and internal mobility. | Talent intelligence platform using AI and market data for enterprise hiring and workforce development. |
| Category | Enterprise, HR, Sourcing, Candidate Identification | Enterprise, Recruiting, Talent, Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C, B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gloat | Retrain.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 132 | 14 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -13.4% | -37.8% |
| Total funding | $182M | $34.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series B |
| Valuation | $900M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 77,174 | 5,850 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gloat | Retrain.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 43/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gloat | Retrain.ai |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Gloat vs Retrain.ai: common questions
Which is better, Gloat or Retrain.ai?
On our 0-100 score Gloat rates higher (62/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gloat and Retrain.ai compare on the numbers?
Gloat leads on our overall score (62/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 39/100), domain rating (66/100 against 43/100), headcount (132 against 14), headcount growth (-13.4% against -37.8%), funding raised ($182M against $34.0M), LinkedIn following (77,174 against 5,850).
Read the full Gloat review and pricing or the Retrain.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Gloat alternatives we track.