Gloat vs Juno Journey
Gloat vs Juno Journey, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gloat is on 62/100 and Juno Journey on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Gloat
- our overall score: 62/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 27/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 35/100
- headcount: 132 against 57
- funding raised: $182M against $22.5M
- LinkedIn following: 77,174 against 11,003
Juno Journey
- headcount growth: +8.0% against -13.4%
At a glance
| Measure | Gloat | Juno Journey |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Gloat's Agile Workforce Operating System uses AI to help enterprises manage talent, skills, and internal mobility. | Personalized employee development platform for onboarding, growth, and retention. |
| Category | Enterprise, HR, Sourcing, Candidate Identification | Enterprise, HR, Employee Management, HR Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C, B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gloat | Juno Journey |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 132 | 57 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -13.4% | +8.0% |
| Total funding | $182M | $22.5M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | $900M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 77,174 | 11,003 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gloat | Juno Journey |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (27/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gloat | Juno Journey |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Crisp, HubSpot |
Gloat vs Juno Journey: common questions
Which is better, Gloat or Juno Journey?
On our 0-100 score Gloat rates higher (62/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gloat and Juno Journey compare on the numbers?
Gloat leads on our overall score (62/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 27/100), domain rating (66/100 against 35/100), headcount (132 against 57), funding raised ($182M against $22.5M), LinkedIn following (77,174 against 11,003). Juno Journey leads on headcount growth (+8.0% against -13.4%).
Read the full Gloat review and pricing or the Juno Journey review and pricing. You can also browse other Gloat alternatives we track.