Gloat vs Joonko
Gloat vs Joonko, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gloat is on 62/100 and Joonko on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Gloat
- our overall score: 62/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 35/100
- headcount: 132 against 18
- headcount growth: -13.4% against -36.8%
- funding raised: $182M against $37.4M
- LinkedIn following: 77,174 against 7,480
Joonko
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Gloat | Joonko |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Gloat's Agile Workforce Operating System uses AI to help enterprises manage talent, skills, and internal mobility. | Talent ecosystem for enriching talent pipelines with pre-qualified diverse candidates. |
| Category | Enterprise, HR, Sourcing, Candidate Identification | Enterprise, HR, Organization, HR Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C, B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gloat | Joonko |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 132 | 18 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -13.4% | -36.8% |
| Total funding | $182M | $37.4M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series B |
| Valuation | $900M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 77,174 | 7,480 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gloat | Joonko |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gloat | Joonko |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Gloat vs Joonko: common questions
Which is better, Gloat or Joonko?
On our 0-100 score Gloat rates higher (62/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gloat and Joonko compare on the numbers?
Gloat leads on our overall score (62/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 22/100), domain rating (66/100 against 35/100), headcount (132 against 18), headcount growth (-13.4% against -36.8%), funding raised ($182M against $37.4M), LinkedIn following (77,174 against 7,480).
Read the full Gloat review and pricing or the Joonko review and pricing. You can also browse other Gloat alternatives we track.