Gloat vs InHerSight
Gloat vs InHerSight, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gloat is on 62/100 and InHerSight on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Gloat
- our overall score: 62/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 132 against 15
- headcount growth: -13.4% against -32.5%
- funding raised: $182M against $4.1M
- LinkedIn following: 77,174 against 17,605
InHerSight
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Gloat | InHerSight |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Gloat's Agile Workforce Operating System uses AI to help enterprises manage talent, skills, and internal mobility. | Platform for women to find company reviews, jobs, and career advice. |
| Category | Enterprise, HR, Sourcing, Candidate Identification | Career Development, Job Search, Workplace Culture, Women in Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C, B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Raleigh, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gloat | InHerSight |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 132 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -13.4% | -32.5% |
| Total funding | $182M | $4.1M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | $900M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 77,174 | 17,605 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gloat | InHerSight |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gloat | InHerSight |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Gloat vs InHerSight: common questions
Which is better, Gloat or InHerSight?
On our 0-100 score Gloat rates higher (62/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gloat and InHerSight compare on the numbers?
Gloat leads on our overall score (62/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 40/100), headcount (132 against 15), headcount growth (-13.4% against -32.5%), funding raised ($182M against $4.1M), LinkedIn following (77,174 against 17,605).
Read the full Gloat review and pricing or the InHerSight review and pricing. You can also browse other Gloat alternatives we track.