Glean vs Sinequa
Glean vs Sinequa, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Glean is on 69/100 and Sinequa on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Glean
- our overall score: 69/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 59/100
- funding raised: $410M against $28.2M
Sinequa
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Glean | Sinequa |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Glean is a Work AI platform that connects to all company data, enabling employees to find, create, and automate anything with AI assistants and agents. | AI-powered enterprise search and analytics platform for knowledge discovery and productivity. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Search, Knowledge Management, Workplace AI | AI, SaaS, Enterprise Search, Analytics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, USA | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Glean | Sinequa |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,475 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +88.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $410M | $28.2M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | $2.2B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 130,056 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Glean | Sinequa |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 56/100 | 12/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Glean | Sinequa |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Matomo |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Glean | Sinequa |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Glean Assistant, Glean Agents, Glean Search, Glean Protect, Connectors, APIs | Not published |
Glean vs Sinequa: common questions
Which is better, Glean or Sinequa?
On our 0-100 score Glean rates higher (69/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Glean and Sinequa compare on the numbers?
Glean leads on our overall score (69/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 47/100), domain rating (78/100 against 59/100), funding raised ($410M against $28.2M).
Read the full Glean review and pricing or the Sinequa review and pricing. You can also browse other Glean alternatives we track.