Glean vs Horizons
Glean vs Horizons, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Glean is on 69/100 and Horizons on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Glean
- our overall score: 69/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 1,475 against 2
- funding raised: $410M against $4.9M
- LinkedIn following: 130,056 against 654
Horizons
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Glean | Horizons |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Glean is a Work AI platform that connects to all company data, enabling employees to find, create, and automate anything with AI assistants and agents. | Diversify Your Home Equity to Bitcoin. No monthly payments and no term limits. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Search, Knowledge Management, Workplace AI | Agentic AI, AI Agent, AI Search Engine, AI Copilot |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, USA | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Glean | Horizons |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,475 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +88.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $410M | $4.9M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| Valuation | $2.2B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 130,056 | 654 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Glean | Horizons |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 38/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 56/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 28/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Glean | Horizons |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Framer |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Glean | Horizons |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Glean Assistant, Glean Agents, Glean Search, Glean Protect, Connectors, APIs | Not published |
Glean vs Horizons: common questions
Which is better, Glean or Horizons?
On our 0-100 score Glean rates higher (69/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Glean and Horizons compare on the numbers?
Glean leads on our overall score (69/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 44/100), domain rating (78/100 against 28/100), headcount (1,475 against 2), funding raised ($410M against $4.9M), LinkedIn following (130,056 against 654).
Read the full Glean review and pricing or the Horizons review and pricing. You can also browse other Glean alternatives we track.