Glaspoort vs Surf Internet
Glaspoort vs Surf Internet, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Glaspoort is on 32/100 and Surf Internet on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Glaspoort
- funding raised: $2.3B against $582M
Surf Internet
- our overall score: 46/100 against 32/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Glaspoort | Surf Internet |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Branches databases like code, adopting CI/CD practices with ephemeral branches from production for rigorous testing. | Fiber internet provider delivering high-speed, reliable connectivity to underserved and rural Great Lakes communities. |
| Category | Fiber Infrastructure, Data Management, DevOps, Cloud Computing | Telecommunications, Internet Service Providers, Broadband, Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | Not published | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Elkhart, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Glaspoort | Surf Internet |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 100 |
| Total funding | $2.3B | $582M |
| Latest round | Debt Financing | Inaugural Fiber ABS |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Glaspoort | Surf Internet |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 32/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 19/100 | 12/100 |
| Quality | 38/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Glaspoort | Surf Internet |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, React, Aspnet | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Glaspoort | Surf Internet |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 2 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“On WAN 1, there is a direct PPPoE fiber optic connection from ISP Freedom via the Glaspoort/KPN network. This connection has a fixed IPv4 address (4x.yyy.zzz.56/32) and a native IPv6 range (2a10:bbb:cccc::/48) with PPP as the connection typ”r/ipv6
Glaspoort vs Surf Internet: common questions
Which is better, Glaspoort or Surf Internet?
On our 0-100 score Surf Internet rates higher (46/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Glaspoort and Surf Internet compare on the numbers?
Glaspoort leads on funding raised ($2.3B against $582M). Surf Internet leads on our overall score (46/100 against 32/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 21/100).
What do real users say about Glaspoort and Surf Internet?
Glaspoort: 1 positive and 2 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ipv6.
Read the full Glaspoort review and pricing or the Surf Internet review and pricing. You can also browse other Glaspoort alternatives we track.